|
A Comparison of Language Intervention Programs Clinical Trials Facts presented on Clinical Trials Search isn't designed to be a substitute for proven healthcare advice, calls or treatment using a real mD. We aren't mDs. Always confer with your physician on A Comparison of Language Intervention Programs conditions. Clinical Trials Search.org is a website dedicated to listing clinical research studies in human subjects. A Comparison of Language Intervention Programs Clinical research trials and A Comparison of Language Intervention Programs healthcare trials happen in a lot of of localities across the United States of America. A clinical trial or clinical study is a research project with human volunteer subjects. Clinical drug trials and pharmaceutical clinical trials generally measure the potency of new drugs. The aim of the studies / undertakings is to answer particular human medical questions. Clinical trials are a popular manner for doctors, government agencies, and private sector corporations to discover remedies for all kinds of circumstances, such as A Comparison of Language Intervention Programs. A Comparison of Language Intervention Programs Clinical Trials and other clinical trials allow volunteers to get healthcare treatment alternatives before they are available to the general public. Most times the participants receive treatment for without cost, and occasionally they are paid for their time. Sometimes there is a cost for a A Comparison of Language Intervention Programs clinical trial. Human subjects often receive the most effective healthcare possible for their A Comparison of Language Intervention Programs condition. Risks are a reality, nonetheless, and may include more or frequent dr. calls, healthcare hazards (perhaps life-threatening), and/or the treatment being ineffective. Trials are federally governed with rigorous guidelines to protect clinical trials subjects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home > "A" Clinical Trials Conditions > A Comparison of Language Intervention Programs  A Comparison of Language Intervention Programs
A Comparison of Language Intervention Programs
For Condition: Language Disorders
Status: Recruiting
Sponsor(s): National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) ,
Synopsis: Brief Summary: Nearly 7% of elementary school children present with difficulties learning and using language. Unfortunately, language impairments are often long lasting and may have serious social, academic, and vocational ramifications. More than 1 million children receive language intervention in the public schools each year, and many more are seen in hospitals and other clinical settings. This randomized clinical trial compares the language outcomes of Fast ForWord to two other interventions (computer assisted language intervention without acoustically modified speech and individual language intervention) and to the outcomes of an academic enrichment (control) condition. Each year for 3 years, children will be randomly assigned to each of the four conditions at three regional sites (Austin, Texas, Dallas, Texas, and Lawrence, Kansas). The treatments will be administered in special summer programs. The primary research question is which intervention results in the most improvement in the composite language score from the Oral and Written Language Scales. Secondary questions include which intervention results in the greatest gains in conversational language,which intervention results in the greatest gains 3 and 6 months after training, which intervention results in the greatest improvement in auditory perception, and which intervention is the most cost effective. The results of the study will have theoretical and practical value. Theoretically, the study tests the temporal processing hypothesis of language impairment. Practically, the study will describe and compare the language, communication, auditory processing and academic outcomes of different language interventions. The study will help clinicians and administrators choose the most effective and least expensive treatment for the children they serve.
Details:
Eligibility:
Study Type: Interventional, Treatment, Randomized, Single Blind, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
Minimum Age/Maximum Age: 6 Years/9 Years
Genders: Both
Protocol Entry Criteria: Inclusion Criteria: - age 6 to 9 years - score between 75 and 125 on the Matrices subtest of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test - Speaking Quotient of 79 or lower on the Test of Language Development: Primary: 3rd Edition Exclusion Criteria: - Previous participation in 8 or more hours of language intervention or classroom activities using any of the Fast ForWord, Laureate, or Earobics speech-language or reading software and/or the Lindamood-Bell auditory discrimination training - Failure of a hearing screening test - An episode of otitis media in the previous 12 months - Evidence of focal brain lesion, traumatic brain injury, cerebral palsy, or seizure disorder - Abnormality of oral structure or function impeding normal language production
Total Enrollment: 216
Location and Contact Information:
Pflugerville Independent School District *Recruiting*
Pflugerville, Texas, 78660
United States
Recruiting Ronald Gillam 512-471-1936
Lawrence Public Schools USD 497 *Recruiting*
Lawrence, Kansas, 66044
United States
Recruiting Diane Loeb 785-864-0638
University of Texas at Dallas *Recruiting*
Richardson, Texas, 75080
United States
Recruiting Emily Tobey 214-905-3105
Additional Information:
Study ID Numbers: UO1 DC 4560;
Study Start Date: June 2002
Record last reviewed: October 2003
Additional information available at: clinicaltrials.gov
Clinicaltrials.gov Reference link: NCT00033150
Other Language Disorders Studies:
1. A Comparison of Language Intervention Programs
Related Studies:
Other Language Disorders Clinical Trials
Other Texas Clinical Trials
Other Pflugerville Clinical Trials
A Comparison of Language Intervention Programs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
